Galaxy Quest (1999)

I haven’t done a retro-review type thing in a while and so I’m going to focus on a film that’s probably one of the best Star Trek movies made, this one features Tim Allen in the captains chair as he finds himself in the middle of an intergalactic incident. Yes, Tim Allen. No, not really Star Trek.
The film is based around a group of actors from a dead TV Show. Much like the real stars of sci fi television they’re doing the convention circuits and just like the Shatners and Hamils couldn’t escape their cult fame, neither can this fictional cast who are ever to be known as the guys in funny suits on that space ship from that TV show people used to watch and now laugh at.
Problem is, not everyone knows their stories are works of fiction and some nearby aliens in distress have come to Earth to search for the crew believing that their TV show was reality. So they head to a convention to take the captain to a replica of his ship they’ve built for him so that he’ll speak to their enemies and end a brutal war on them.
With only a superfan to help guide them from the ground, the actors muddle through their mission and try to save the day – this time for real.
The casting for this was brilliant. Despite me not being a fan of his comedic endeavers most of the time, Allen nailed this role taking the piss out of William Shatner, who mentioned years later on Raw Nerve that he loved the parody. And he’s he full parody. The character he plays, Captain Taggart, is a womaniser who’s shirt will fall off with the slghtest scrape and he immerses himself in his fans who see him as a joke of his former self.
Alien star Sigourney Weaver joined the fun as the fictional shows Uhural but for me the standout performance is Alan Rickman’s portrayal of Sir Alexander Dane/Dr. Lazerus, the Spock of the show. A classically trained actor who resents his television role and how it’s typecast him since the show was cancelled.
Like most other Rickman role’s he’s just absolutely wonderful at the comedic and witty bitterness and steals any scene he’s in. But considering the Shatner-Nimoy rivalry, I’m not entirely sure that’s an accident.
The film was one of the best parodies I’ve ever seen. Not only that, it was just plain fun. But let’s look at the opinions of the objects of the affectionate humour…
I had originally not wanted to see Galaxy Quest because I heard that it was making fun of Star Trek and then Jonathan Frakes rang me up and said “You must not miss this movie! See it on a Saturday night in a full theatre”. And I did and of course I found it was brilliant. Brilliant. No one laughed louder or longer in the cinema than I did, but the idea that the ship was saved and all of our heroes in that movie were saved simply by the fact that there were fans who did understand the scientific principles on which the ship worked was absolutely wonderful. And it was both funny and also touching in that it paid tribute to the dedication of these fans
-Patrick Stewart
I think it’s a chillingly realistic documentary ! The details in it, I recognized every one of them. It is a powerful piece of documentary filmmaking. And I do believe that when we get kidnapped by aliens, it’s going to be the genuine, true Star Trek fans who will save the day. … I was rolling in the aisles. And Tim Allen had that Shatner-esque swagger down pat. And I roared when the shirt came off, and Sigourney rolls her eyes and says, ‘There goes that shirt again.’ … How often did we hear that on the set?
-George Takei
If you’re a fan of Star Trek – or sci fi in general – whether you’re a convention goer or a casual watcher, or are even caught up in the nostalgic novelty of old productions, you’ll get the inside gags. If not, you’ll be entertained by it all anyway.
So go watch it…

…or I’ll send Worf out to eat you.
No related posts.
Comments
Comment from theredeemed
Time 24.03.2010 at 18:32
BLOG! Galaxy Quest (1999) – via @twitoaster http://theredeemed.co.uk/watcher/galaxy-...
Comment from Marty Michaels
Time 25.03.2010 at 03:24
Not much to add except Sigourney Weaver is proper hot in this film. Like, proper ooooft hot.
Comment from JustMe
Time 25.03.2010 at 11:52
Great movie and a very affectionate parody.
BTW-is that you mentioned in the Arts section of the Herald?
James Tyler Reply:
March 25th, 2010 at 11:57
If it’s a nice mention, then yes. If it’s a nasty one, then no
Comment from Majik
Time 25.03.2010 at 14:13
I’m no Trekky. In fact, most sci fi turns me off utterly. However, this is a film of such genius, that I can only mirror your own comments. A must see for both reasons: you enjoy laughing at geeks, or you are a geek who doesn’t mind being laughed with.
James Tyler Reply:
March 26th, 2010 at 09:44
Exactly! And most of us geeks are in the ‘laugh at ourselves’ category. Those who aren’t… well, they’re all on the Galifrey Base promising to assassinate Russel T Davies or spending weeks in front of a computer writing a note by note analysis of why Nemesis was a terribly movie.
Odd question – most sci fi turns you off, what sci fi turns you on? Not in an Emmanuelle in Space way…
…the reason I ask, SyFy has this theory at the moment that the less of a science fiction element they place into a science fiction show, the more accessable it’ll become. Which is the Caprica theory – it looks like Earth, it’s humans having human problems… but do the watchers care?
Majik Reply:
March 26th, 2010 at 10:01
The thing that turns me off Science Fiction is the fiction element. I’m one of the seeming minority that just can’t watch Dr Who without wanting to chew the power cable of the TV in the hope that silence and death arrive at the same time to save me from evil Wheelie bins, Daleks that weigh just over 30 lbs and a screwdriver that seems to have inherited the “Superman effect”. Give me something based on science boundaries being pushed, and I’m fascinated – the moment reality is a dot on the horizon, I’m lost…
James Tyler Reply:
March 26th, 2010 at 10:36
Aha! I see where you’re coming from entirely. I think thats in part what dragged me into Trek. The technomagic was often unobtainable bullshit but it was all based on actual theory that people were either working on, or have worked on since. I’m still amazed they’ve came up with Geordies Visor and the Tricorder – even though both are extremely low tech in comparison.
Unfortunately they went too far by the time of Voyager and it was swaying to the side of bullshit more than theory and ‘Borg Nanoprobes’ became the same magic wand the sonic screwdriver had when RTD was writing Who. That made me appreciate the Who-isms more, I suddenly loved the anti-technobabble that some shows had user as overkill and dealing with transdimensional residue by calling it ‘stuff’ and the ‘timey wimey detector, goes ding when there’s stuff’ type lines just began to amuse me.
When I’m writing it I have my own limited knowledge and reference books from some brilliant authors and scientists, one of whom does Trek science books which is brilliant for my time killing hobby, but I always try and put that in a realistic setting. In Next Gen, LeVar Burton tried to make the technobabble realistic by saying it as fast as he possibly could, as if he was speeding through the thoughts in his mind instead of making the words sound complex and awe inspiring. I like to remind myself of an engineer I know… he doesn’t spout off technobabble or lose you in thought, he knows what he’s doing… and thats all that matters to him.
I think theres room for both hard science and magical fantasy in sci fi – but more recently I’ve been interested in story and character more than challenging concepts. They’re good for the odd film or episode – Se7en was a good film, for example, but not every production could be like that and the less there are, the more special the film is – but overkill on something that’ll make you think is not enough to keep the audience emotionally interested, which is the main key to the current generation of TV – which is somewhat a sad thing to say.
Life on Mars is a good example. There was a sci fi element, but it wasn’t obvious… the story was more about the man and his struggle with the changes around him. BSG was less about the science and more about the personal struggles and overall story of being the last of humanity on the run. So I think I’m leaning towards the SF Drama more than anything thse days…
…and I’ve said more than I thought I would. I could make this into a blog of it’s own, really.


James Tyler Reply:
March 25th, 2010 at 11:57
Yes she is – she seemed to have aged incredibly well since Alien. And Ghostbusters – which was my first encounter with her…
Marty Michaels Reply:
March 25th, 2010 at 14:05
I dunno man, she’s pretty hot at the end of Alien. That vest! Those pants!
James Tyler Reply:
March 26th, 2010 at 09:39
True. Though I think I still find her hotter as an evil possessed being who’s filthy and sleeps three feet above her covers. But then, I found her hot in Alien Ressurection when she was manic and creepy.