The Daily Mail versus Doctor Who

A few peope have noticed, and mocked, the Daily Mail for their recent coverage of Doctor Who. It’s absolutely fascinating how far they’ll go to have a moan. It’s as if before this new era of Doctor Who, the world of television was one of purity and politeness, where no imagination was challenged.
The RTD era gained some attention, mainly for what the nutjob fans called his ‘gay agenda’. This was probably one of RTD’s best moments of writing. A lot of the time it was subtle, the odd reference to a same sex spouse or something. The best part of it was that it wasn’t treated as weird, or shocking, or bizarre or controversial. It felt like, for the first time, a character being gay wasn’t a defining part of him. In a soap, usually a character is gay and he needs no other hook. He’s the only gay in the villiage, and thats his entire character. Does Coronation Street’s Sean have any defining characteristic that isn’t an over the top squeal? No, not really.
Adding more personal drama wasn’t a bad move. Television had evolved and Doctor Who had to in order to survive. It wasn’t quite as black and white as before, not that the show ever was. Hell, in the beginning the Doctor is a maniac who kidnaps two humans, treats his granddaughter like an idiot and does a runner. But Davies had to add something and he did. Not everyone liked it, but it worked and some of the best moments related to his more emotional hook.
But thankfully the gay agenda lot seemed to shut up, even though Davies was labelled a hack. Everyone began praising Moffat as the best thing since sliced bread and as soon as the reigns were handed over, the praise and respect turned into another reason to moan. Not just for hthe nutjob fanbase, but it seems the Daily Fail has started their own bandwagon and I expect them to get sillier and more pointless as the series goes on.
With Moffat, in a few episodes he seems to have caused more of a fuss than Davies. Not because of bad writing. But because of Amy Pond, the weeping angels and looking at the bigger picture of the fanbase. His companion for the doctor was too sexy. She’s a kissogram with a nice pair of legs which caused the Daily Mail to decide that Who should go back to it’s roots of not being sexy. What? Did no one see Leela wearing next to nothing every week? Peri’s chebs giggling around her low cut spandex tops? Even further back we’d seen Zoe in sme rather spanktastic outfits.
Then there was the scene. Amy kisses the Doctor, this leads into the Doctor sorting it out in the next episode and oh noes! The Daily Mail strikes. Too adult, not suitable for children, someone think of the children! Looking back I can remember moments in family shows that has filthy moments in it, but I didn’t notice at the time. My dad would giggle, my mum would look embarrassed and I’d be confused. Whats new there?
They also dubbed the monsters too scary. For the Daily Mail, the solution was to praise the Davies era for replacing scare with drama, and bashing the Moffat era for digging out the old Doctor Who tricks.
I don’t get the complaint. Mainly as I watch Doctor Who every week with two kids aged four and seven, and neither of them feel the fear. Neither of them thought “Amy wants to pump the Doctor!” There was no stripping of their innocence or filth in their minds, they saw the simplest thing – so whats wrong with that?
Another thing to consider is the audience. The show was initially written for kids, but as the audience and fanbase grew, it became a more family orientated show with something for everyone. In it’s 2005 return it seemed ot have that same theme, but delved into more of a high octane adventure for kids with the cheery antics of Tennant’s incarnation of the Doctor. The problem is that even since its return, that audience has grown up five years and although it’s still marketed towards kids, Moffat is obviously being more aware that there are more than ten year olds in the audience.
So in short – The Daily Mail are still idiots. Anyone who pays money for the shambles of a newspaper deserve shooting.
No related posts.
Comments
Comment from Marty Michaels
Time 10.05.2010 at 13:11
It’s all the immigrants’ fault, none of this would’ve happened if Diana was still alive…
Comment from Doctor What
Time 12.05.2010 at 20:44
It’s typical Daily Mail nonsense. Anything for a story.
admin Reply:
May 13th, 2010 at 10:14
I’m wondering what’ll come next. I can’t remember who published complaints on Jack and Alonzo hooking up in the Tennant finale. But I’m guessing it was the Mail. I’ve avoided my google reader in fear of them mentioning the stripper cake.
Comment from talis74
Time 12.05.2010 at 22:34
I’d love to watch back old episodes and see what could be compained about. Moffat Who is more in line with classic who but we seem to be too sensitive a culture these days always on the hunt for the next complaint.
admin Reply:
May 13th, 2010 at 10:17
I read somewhere recently, can’t remember where or who, something about how terrifying the Cybermen looked in black and white despite being horribly primitive.
I never got the fear as a kid, but there’s always the cliche of kids watching Doctor Who behind the couch in fear and how brilliant it was – now it’s got to that point again, it’s suddenly wrong.
Comment from CmdrReeves
Time 13.05.2010 at 10:10
Hey- are you completely redoing the site? look and all. weird with the all geek content, all geek domain name and hardman pic
admin Reply:
May 13th, 2010 at 10:19
Yes and no. With a maybe in there too. I’m considering everything from a full redesign, to tweaking the existing template to using the original TPM template to merging… I haven’t decided yet – but I want to have a reasonably uniformed look.
I’m not even sure if I’ll bring back the forums yet or the open blogs – and if I do the latter, I’d be opening the front page and stuff to be less about my ramblings.


admin Reply:
May 13th, 2010 at 10:13
Don’t forget the gays.